Depends on your motivation. If you are a parent and you want your kid to get a full-ride to an SEC or ACC Division I university, you want ONE club in the state that will allow your kid the best training and the opportunity to succeed at the regional/national level.
If your motivation is less than what I have described above....then yes, you probably want to see competitive balance among clubs so at least your kid can get some competitive in-state games. (You also want your kid to receive decent training/coaching).
I want my son to advance as far as his ability and desire will take him. He's played Premier League and ODP and has lots of potential. I don't see how having one "super-club" enhances his future. To the contrary, I think that having three or four excellent clubs increases the likelihood that more kids will reach their potential than would be the case with fewer such clubs.
To be clear, I don't think it is possible for one club to dominate. My real gripe is that no club should attempt to dominate by poaching the best players from around the state. If player X thinks he/she would be best served by CESA/CUFC/BridgeFA/MPSC..., it is no mystery how to contact them. It just seems wrong to me that any of the above would attempt to persuade player X to leave his/her current club. My strong preference would be for a rule that prohibited any contact, beyond written notice of tryouts, that wasn't initiated by the player or parents.
