The key here is that 1- nobody knew what the penalty for the infraction was, it took them a good 10 min to decide 2- there is no recourse for the complaint, time should have been added on, but how much?
I personally do not think it was the whole 2nd half, I also believe that although possible a bunkered Wando was not going to give anything up... for the record there was a lot more noise at the end of the 2nd half on near the Wando box.
Whoever said that Lexington did not dominate does not know the game. However Wando scored a nice legitimate goal in the first 10 minutes and had no shots for the rest of the game.
The hardest part is how do you tell a competitive athlete that her work for the whole game would not have changed the outcome. You cannot, they will believe forever and a day that they were cheated and could have been diferent. It is normal human emotion, heck we would not be on this board if we all agrreed on everything.
It is unfortunate that Wando's win will have this aura.
To the SCHSL powers... read Floriday's comments: One error.... we are all human butr a pattern is a pattern, isn't this part of problem solving taught in schools? this is no longer an error
