More interesting discussion here than the boys side.
I have personally not seen the "procedure" for the selecting process.
So I would guess that the committee used that all standby, "this is who I think are the best players". If the list is produced by knowledgeable people ( I think they are) it will have less bias. Therefore the only discussion left is "why I think Sallie is beter than Jane" at which point you end with an opinion, which by the way is what the Super 22 list is.
So based on the opinions of the selecting committee these are the best. You do not have to agree with them.
On the boys side it is loaded with sophomores and there is a player (IMO quite deserving of the choice to the super 22) who was not even selected to All Region (never mind all state). Yet the impact the player had for his HS team was most definetely seen. Is there a similar story in the girls group?.
