soccerislife - you don't like wal-mart?

rabbit - was that the acapella version?

galaxy –you obviously got the extra credit question correct. i tried to present facts. maybe there was some sarcasm and opinions in there. but i will try it again – lecture format.

1. staff – this is really fairly simple, isn’t it? Having full-time staff dedicating their time to a profession will result in a better product and results. cesa has directors and coaches whose profession is club soccer. nobody said anything about columbia nor charleston not having quality coaches, because there are good coaches there. i also didn't perceive anything about cufc coaches being pe coaches - the reality is that a cufc doc is a pe teacher.
2. results - can’t believe this is even a debate. 34 or 35 championships hardly suggests anything other than a quality, comprehensive product – club, staff, players.
3. out of town players - i think rabbit summed it up by pointing out that for years columbia was able to attract a lot of out of town players. so now that cesa is getting these players, this isn't accepted? what people may not know is that a lot more players and parents contact cesa than the other way around.
4. player development – surely you don’t really think that cesa doesn’t develop players? What do attribute the attraction for out of town players to? Why do they choose to come to cesa?
4. cesa is how old? cesa is almost 4 years old. Cufc is almost 2 years old. I thought you would catch the sarcasm there. The point here is that many folks act as if cesa is the old timer. The margin in results is far greater than that of years in existence.